USCIS proposes new alternative to attract International Entrepreneurs to stay in the US

International entrepreneurs, who find find it difficult to satisy the EB5 criteria as they are unable to raise overseas investment, may soon be provided an alternative route. US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is proposing a new rule which is aimed at expanding immigration options for foreign entrepreneurs who meet certain criteria for creating jobs, attracting investment and generating revenue in the U.S. This rule would allow certain international entrepreneurs to be considered for parole (temporary permission to be in the United States) so that they may start or scale their businesses here in the United States.

The proposed rule would allow the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to use its existing discretionary statutory parole authority for entrepreneurs of startup entities whose stay in the United States would provide a significant public benefit through the substantial and demonstrated potential for rapid business growth and job creation.

Initial Approval: As per the proposed rule, an entrepreneur may be granted an initial stay of upto two years to oversee and grow their startup in the US. To establish that the enterpreneur qualifies for this rule, it must be established that the enterpreneur created a new entity within the last 3 years and is well-positioned to advance the entity’s business, by providing evidence that he or she possesses a significant (at least 15 percent) ownership interest in the entity at the time of adjudication of the initial grant of parole and  has an active and central role in the operations and future growth of the entity, such that his or her knowledge, skills, or experience would substantially assist the entity in conducting and growing its business in the United States.

To validate the entity’s substantial potential for rapid growth and job creation, the applicant may show that the entity has received significant investment of capital ($345,000 or more) from certain qualified U.S. investors with established records of successful investments, or that the start-up entity has received significant awards  or grants ($4100,000 or more) from Federal, State or local government entities with expertise in economic development, research and development, and/or job creation. Alternatively, an applicant who partially meets one or more of the above sub-criteria related to capital investment or government funding may be considered for parole under this rule if he or she provides additional evidence that his or her entry would provide a significant public benefit to the United States.

Extension: USCIS may grant a subsequent request for extension of parole (for up to three additional years) only if the entrepreneur and the startup entity continue to provide a significant public benefit as evidenced by substantial increases in capital investment, revenue or job creation. To establish this, the applicant would need to demonstrate that the entity continues to lawfully operate business in the United States and have substantial potential for rapid growth and job creation. Moreover, the applicant should continue to be an entrepreneur of the start-up entity who is well-positioned to advance the entity’s business by continuing to possess at least 10 percent ownership interest in the entity and continue to have an active and central role in the operations and future growth of the entity. For parole extension, the applicant needs to satisfy though evidence that the start-up entity received additional substantial investments of capital ($500,000 or more)  through qualified investments from U.S. investors or through significant awards or grants from government entities that regularly provide such funding to start-up entities; or a combination of both. Alternatively, the applicant may show that the start-up entity has generated substantial and rapidly increasing revenue in the United States  (At least $500,000 in annual revenue with average growth at leat 20 % annually), or by creating at least 10 full-time jobs for U.S. workers during the initial parole period.

As with initial parole, an applicant who partially meets one or more of the above sub-criteria related to capital investment or government funding may be considered for parole extension under this rule if he or she provides additional evidence that his or her entry would provide a significant public benefit to the United States.


The text of the proposed rule that was announced by US Department of Homeland Security on August 24, 2016 can be read on the link below:



USCIS announces 36 months OPT and other changes for STEM students and their employers

USCIS announces 36 months OPT and other changes for STEM students and their employers

The Department of Homeland Security has published a final rule allowing certain F-1 students who receive science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) degrees, and who meet other specified requirements, to apply for a 24-month extension of their 12 months post-completion OPT instead of  the 17-month STEM OPT extension previously available eligible students. Students may begin applying for a 24-month STEM OPT extension on May 10, 2016.

The employers who want to provide a practical training opportunity to a STEM OPT student during his or her extension must:

  • Be enrolled in E-Verifyand remain in good standing.
  • Report material changes to the STEM OPT student’s employment to the DSO within 5 business days.
  • Implement a formal training program to augment the student’s academic learning through practical experience.
  • Provide an OPT opportunity that is commensurate with those of similarly situated U.S. workers in duties, hours, and compensation.
  • Complete the Form I-983, Training Plan for STEM OPT Students. In this form,  the employer must attest that:
  • They have enough resources and trained personnel available to appropriately train the student;
  • The student will not replace a full- or part-time, temporary or permanent U.S. worker; and
  • Working for the employer will help the student attain his or her training objectives.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement may visit employer’s worksite(s) to verify whether they are meeting the STEM OPT program requirements, including whether they are maintaining the ability and resources to provide structured and guided work-based learning experiences for the STEM OPT student.

The law allows OPT students to be unemployed during their OPT period for upto 90 days, and during the 24 months extension upto an additional 60 days (Upto a total of 150 days during the 3 years OPT).

The rule permits an F-1 student participating in a 12-month period of post-completion OPT based on a non-STEM degree to use a prior eligible STEM degree from a U.S. institution of higher education as a basis to apply for a STEM OPT extension, as long as both degrees were received from currently accredited educational institutions.

If a STEM student currently has a 17-month STEM OPT extension, such individual may apply to add 7 months to your STEM OPT period on or after May 10, 2016 as long as the individual has at least 150 days of valid employment authorization remaining.

The rule also includes a number of requirements intended to help DHS track STEM OPT students and further enhance the integrity of the STEM OPT extension. Most prominent among these are reporting requirements, which the rule imposes primarily upon students and designated school officials (DSOs). The rule includes four main  reporting requirements, as follows.

  1. The rule imposes a six-month validation requirement, under which a STEM OPT student and his or her school must work together to confirm the validity of certain biographical, residential, and employment information concerning the student, including the student’s legal name, the student’s address, the employer’s name and address, and current employment status.
  2. The rule imposes an annual self-evaluation requirement, under which the student must report to the DSO on his or her progress with the practical training. The student’s employer must sign the self-evaluation prior to its submission to the DSO.
  3. The rule requires that the student and employer report changes in employment status, including the student’s termination or departure from the employer.
  4. Both the student and the employer are obligated to report to the DSO material changes to, or material deviations from, the student’s formal training plan.

FinCEN proposes important changes in FBAR reporting

FinCEN proposes few important changes in FBAR reporting FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) intends to make certain important amendments in FBAR reporting by eliminating reporting requi…

Source: FinCEN proposes important changes in FBAR reporting

FinCEN proposes important changes in FBAR reporting


FinCEN proposes few important changes in FBAR reporting

FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) intends to make certain important amendments in FBAR reporting by eliminating reporting requirement individually by officers with signature authority due to their employment responsibilities, but with no financial interests in foreign financial accounts. FinCEN also proposes to require filers with 25 or more foreign financial accounts also to report, like other reporters, detailed account information on all foreign financial accounts for which they are required to file an FBAR.

In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FinCEN intends to revise and clarify certain provisions in the FBAR reporting rules regarding the filing of Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR). The revisions would mainly apply to financial professionals who file FBARs due to their employment responsibilities.

The NPRM proposes to:

  • Remove the provisions that limit the information reported with respect to situations when a filer has 25 or more foreign financial accounts, and instead require all U.S. persons obligated to file an FBAR to report detailed account information on all foreign financial accounts for which they are required to file an FBAR.
  • Amend the FBAR regulation by eliminating the requirement for officers and employees of institutions to report on institutional accounts for which they have signature authority, but no financial interest, due solely to their employment, so long as their employer has an FBAR filing obligation. This exemption will be available only if such accounts are required to be reported under by the entity or any other entity within the same corporate or other business structure. This exemption would not be available to a U.S. person who is employed by a foreign entity and has signature authority over the foreign financial accounts of the foreign entity in which case the foreign entity/employer has no obligation to report its financial interest to FinCEN under the FBAR regulations.
  • Require institutions to maintain a list of all officers and employees with signature authority over those same accounts; this list would be made available to FinCEN and law enforcement upon request.

FinCEN has previously issued temporary notices of exemptions concerning those filers covered by this NPRM, and those temporary exemptions remain unaffected.

The FBAR is a calendar year report ending December 31 of the reportable year which is due to be filed by June 30, 2016 for 2015 tax year. However, beginning with the 2016 tax year, as changed by recent legislation, the due date for FBAR reporting will be April 15 of the year following the December 31 report ending date.

FinCEN announcement link –


Overwhelming opposition to IRS proposed rule for optional reporting of Donor’s Tax Identification details by the Donee organizations

Overwhelming opposition to IRS proposed rule for optional reporting of Donor’s Tax Identification details by the Donee organizations

December 16th is the deadline for Treasury Department and IRS to hear comments on all aspects of the proposed rules concerning the time and manner for donee organizations to file newly proposed information returns that would report the required information about contributions (donee reporting). This filing would provide an exception to the “contemporaneous written acknowledgement” requirement for substantiating charitable contribution deductions, whereby a taxpayer who claims a charitable deduction for any contribution of $250 or more is required to obtain substantiation in the form of a contemporaneous written acknowledgment (CWA) from the donee organization.

The proposed regulations require that, in order for a donor to be relieved of the current CWA requirement, a donee organization that uses donee reporting must file a return with the IRS reporting certain information and must furnish a copy of the return to the donor whose contribution is reported on such return. These regulations provide the content of the return under section 170(f)(8)(D), the time for filing the return, and the requirement to furnish a copy to the donor. Moreover, any burden associated with the collection of information under the proposed regulations is minimized by the fact that donee reporting under the proposed regulations is optional on the part of any donee, including small entities. However, the proposed rule is optional and the donees need not use this donee reporting process and donors can continue to use the current CWA process.

Text of Federal Register announcement for proposed rule

Most of the charities feel that the proposal is a bad idea and have overwhelmingly expressed their voice against the proposed rule.

Comments to the proposed regulations

The National Council of Nonprofits opposes the proposed Donee Reporting Rule and encourages donors and nonprofits to submit comments to the federal government explaining the real-world consequences of the rule, if promulgated as written.

According to a note published by the:

1. “Never” is the better answer. A charitable nonprofit should never be asking a donor for her or his Social Security number when soliciting donations; if someone is asking in relation to a donation, that should be considered a sign of a scam or fraudulent solicitation.

2. The proposed Donee Reporting Rule conflicts with the IRS’ advice to taxpayers. The Internal Revenue Service advises taxpayers on its website and on a YouTube video to only give out their Social Security numbers when “absolutely necessary.” Yet the IRS proposed voluntary system essentially requires nonprofits to do just that: ask donors to give out their SSNs when it is not absolutely necessary. Voluntary and “absolutely necessary” are polar opposite  instructions that undermine taxpayer protections and public confidence – public confidence in both the IRS and innocent charitable nonprofits.

3. Requests for Social Security numbers could result in reduced charitable contributions. Numerous individuals commenting on the proposed rule have raised the concern that donors will be unwilling to contribute more than $250 to a charitable nonprofit if it asks for Social Security numbers.

4. Concerns about identity theft are very real. Just this year, hackers have accessed sensitive employee data at the federal Office of Personnel Management and the Central Intelligence Agency, two sophisticated entities with the resources and commitment to fighting intelligence breaches. And yet, hackers could not be thwarted. It is irresponsible for Treasury and the IRS to propose a system that calls on nonprofits to collect, store, and protect SSNs when identity theft is a growing challenge that even the federal government is not yet able to overcome.

5. The current contemporaneous written acknowledgement system is working. The proposed regulations make several admissions that raise the question: why are Treasury and the IRS bothering to create a new, optional, parallel reporting regime that will require more administrative burdens on both nonprofits and government personnel? The background description of the status quo states that the present contemporaneous written acknowledgement (CWA) “system works effectively, with minimal burden on donors and donees, and the Treasury and the IRS have received few requests … to implement a donee reporting system.” Treasury and the IRS even repeat their key admission: “Given the effectiveness and minimal burden of the CWA process, it is expected that donee reporting will be used in an extremely low percentage of cases.” Since there is not an overriding need for an alternative system, the flawed proposal to adopt a confusing and potentially dangerous Donee Report Rule should be rejected.

6. Just because the proposal is voluntary now is no reason to ignore its potential adverse impacts. Some might say they are not concerned about the proposed Donee Report Rule because it is purely voluntary at this time.

Due Dates For Filing FBAR, Corporation And Partnership Returns Changed From 2016

Due Dates For Filing FBAR, Corporation And Partnership Returns Changed From 2016

The filling due dates for certain filings to be done in 2017 onwards for tax years beginning after December 31, 2015 have been changed. Strangely the changes have come from in an unexpected way with the President signing H.R.3236 – Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act of 2015 on July 31, 2015 – into law.

FBAR FORM 114 – The due date of FBAR – FinCEN Report Form 114 (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) shall be April 15, to coincide with the due date for filing 1040 Individual Income Tax returns. For the first time, taxpayers would also be able to file for an extension – for period up to 6-month till October 15.  As a relief for first time innocent omission to file, in the case of any taxpayer required to file such Form for the first time, any penalty for failure to timely request for, or file, an extension, may be waived by the Secretary.

PARTNERSHIP RETURNS (Form 1065) – The due date for Partnerships would be March 15 instead of April 15 as in the case of S Corporations, with a six months extension till September 15th. However, for Partnership filers who prepare returns on the basis of a fiscal year basis will be required to be file on or before the 15th day of the third month (instead of fourth month) following the close of the fiscal year, with an option six month extension.

C CORPORATION RETURNS (Form 1120) – The due date for C Corporations is also being changed to April 15 instead of March 15, with a 5 months extension till September 15. However, filers who prepare returns on the basis of a fiscal year basis will be required to be file on or before the 15th day of the fourth month (instead of third month) following the close of the fiscal year, with an option for five month extension until 2026. However, corporations which have a June 30 year end would get a seven-month extension until 2026.

OTHER RETURNS – The extension periods for filing Forms 1041, 5500, 990, 4720, 5227, 6069, 8870, 3520-A, 3520 have also been revised.

Other Significant Changes

Additional information on Form 1098 relating to mortgage interest

Mortgage information statements that are required to be sent to individuals who pay more than $600 in mortgage interest in a year will now be required to include the outstanding principal on the mortgage at the beginning of the calendar year, date of origination of the mortgage and the address of the property that secures the mortgage. These changes apply to returns and statements due after Dec. 31, 2016.

Inherited assets – Consistency in basis reporting between estate and beneficiaries

H.R.3236 also provides that anyone inheriting property from a decedent cannot treat the property as having a higher basis than the basis reported by the estate for estate tax purposes. It also creates a new Sec. 6035, which requires executors of estates that are required to file an estate tax return to furnish information returns to the IRS as well as the beneficiaries statements which will identify the value of each interest in property acquired from the estate as reported on the estate tax return. These amendments shall apply to property with respect to which an estate tax return is filed after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Here is the link to the H.R. 3236 –



(This is a mandatory compliance from U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) and NOT a tax compliance)

The Benchmark Survey of U.S. Direct Investment Abroad is conducted by U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis to secure current economic data on the operation of U.S. Parent companies and their foreign affiliates. This is a mandatory survey conducted every 5 years.  For certain large companies there is annual filing requirement.


If U.S. person had a foreign affiliate, that is, that had direct or indirect ownership or control of at least 10 percent of the voting stock of an incorporated foreign business enterprise, or an equivalent interest in an unincorporated foreign business enterprise, at any time during the U.S. person’s 2014 fiscal year, they need to file BE-10 report. For this purpose, US person includes any individual, branch, partnership, associated group, association, estate, trust, corporation, or other government or nongovernment organization.

There are different complex forms (BE 10A/ BE10B/ BE10C/ BE1D) which need to be filed by different US persons as may be applicable for them based on different criteria to be evaluated separately for each such U. S. Person.


For 2014, a fully completed BE-10A forms along with the applicable form(s) is due no later than June 30, 2015 (extended due date for many filers)


Extension request must be filed by the due date. 


Whoever fails to report shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $2,500 and not more than $25,000.  Whoever willfully fails to report shall be fined upto $10,000.  Any officer, director, employee or agent of any corporation who knowingly participates in such violations, upon conviction, may be punished by fine, imprisonment or both. 

Please let us know if any of this applies to you/ your business and you want us to assist in the filing of above mandatory compliance.  As the due date of 30 June 2015 has now fast approaching, please contact us at the earliest.  Again, please be aware that it is a mandatory compliance.

We look forward to hearing from you soon. As always, contact us if you have any questions.

Last Minute reminder – Deadline for FBAR filing for 2014 is June 30, 2015

FOREIGN BANK & FINANCIAL ACCOUNT REPORTING (FBAR) Form 114  may be required to be filed if you have a financial interest in or signature authority over a foreign financial account, including a bank account, brokerage account, mutual fund, trust, or other type of foreign financial account.

Form 114 replaces TD F 90-22.1, the FBAR form used in the past. It is due to the Treasury Department by Tuesday, June 30, must be filed electronically. This due date cannot be extended and tax extensions do not extend the FBAR filing due date.

The requirement as per FBAR instructions and guidelines is that if at any time during the year, the aggregate of balances in overseas accounts was more $10000, then reporting has to be done by filing this form. This filing is independent of the Filing of Federal and/ or State Income Tax returns. You may be required to provide information even when you have signature or other authority but no Financial interest in the account.
There is no extension for FBAR form.

Important Reporting Requirements by U.S. Taxpayers Holding Foreign Financial Assets (Form 8938) w.e.f. from 2011 onwards

In addition to the FBAR filing, Taxpayers with specified foreign financial assets that exceed certain thresholds must report those assets to the IRS on Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets. The new Form 8938 filing requirement does not replace or otherwise affect a taxpayers requirement to file FBAR. This Form is part of the Tax return and accordingly must be filed by the due date of Individual tax return in Form 1040.

If you are required to file Form 8938 but do not file a complete and correct Form 8938 by the due date (including extensions), you may be subject to a penalty of $10,000.


The IRS is also currently offering people with undisclosed income from offshore accounts an opportunity to participate in Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program 2012 (OVDP) in order to get current on their FBAR filings and tax returns.

For the program 2012, the penalty framework requires individuals to pay a penalty of 27.5 percent of the highest aggregate balance in foreign bank accounts/entities or value of foreign assets during the eight full tax years prior to the disclosure.

Taxpayers participating in the new initiative must file all original and amended tax returns and include payment for taxes, interest and accuracy-related penalties.

However, new Streamlined Procedure introduced from July 2014, is a relief for the person who wants to disclose offshore income and foreign assets not disclosed earlier.  The penalty is reduced to 5% of the highest aggregate yearend balance of assets of the years falling in the procedure for the U.S. individual taxpayers residing in the United States and 0% for U.S. individual taxpayers residing outside the United Statessubject to fulfilling of some other conditions.

If you would like us to file the FBAR for 2014 or for any of the earlier years, for you please provide us with the following detail for each of your overseas account:
– Name and address of the Bank or financial institution
– Account number and type of account
– Maximum balance at any time in the last calendar year and year end balances
– Whether account held Jointly with another individual

When you have signature or other authority but no Financial interest in the account, you have to provide the above information and in addition provide the following details:

– Name and address of the primary Account holder

– Taxpayer ID of the account holder, if any

– If account holder is an organization, filer’s relationship/ Title with the organization.

If you would like to avail of the benefit of Amnesty under 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) or Streamlined Offshore Procedures and would like our assistance for the purpose, please call us to make an appointment. We would be happy to assist you in these matters. We would be billing separately for these services.


May 21, 2015 – USCIS guidance announcement 

USCIS has today announced that whenever there is a new location for an employee outside the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), merely filing a new LCA is not enough – An amended H1B petition has also to be filed. An employer must file an amended H-1B petition if their H-1B employee changed, or is going to change, his or her place of employment to a worksite location outside of the metropolitan statistical area (MSA) or an “area of intended employment”, even if a new LCA is already certified and posted at the new location. Once the employer files the amended petition, the H-1B employee can immediately begin to work at the new location without waiting for a final decision on the amended petition for that  H-1B employee to start work at the new location. This is based on a recent decision of USCIS Administrative Appeal Office (AAO) who has issued a precedent decision in the Matter of Simeio Solutions, LLC.

What happens to existing cases before the announcement on May 21, 2015 – Employers must file amended petition before August 19, 2015?

USCIS has also announced that if any of the H-1B employees were changing worksite locations at the time of the Simeio Solutions decision, the employers have 90 days from the date of this announcement (May 21, 2015) to file amended petitions for H-1B employees who changed their place of employment to an MSA or area of intended employment requiring coverage by a new or different LCA than that submitted with the original H-1B petition. Therefore, if an employer has not filed an amended petition for an H-1B worker who moved worksite locations before May 21, 2015, they have until August 19, 2015 to file an amended petition. Also, if any of the H-1B workers changed their worksite location before the Simeio Solutions decision, USCIS will not take adverse action against the employer or the employee if the employer, in good faith, relied on prior non-binding agency correspondence and did not file an amended petition due to a change in an MSA or area of intended employment by May 21, 2015. However, the employer must now file an amended petition for these H-1B employees by August 19, 2015. If the employer does not file an amended petition for these employees by August 19, 2015, they will be out of compliance with USCIS regulation and policy and thus subject to adverse action.  Similarly, the H-1B employees would not be maintaining their nonimmigrant status and would also be subject to adverse action.

If somehow, the amended H-1B petition is denied, but the original petition is still valid the H-1B employee may return to the worksite covered by the original petition as long as the H-1B employee is able to maintain valid nonimmigrant status at the original worksite. Moreover, if the previously-filed amended H-1B petition is still pending, the employer may still file another amended petition to allow your H-1B employee to change worksite locations immediately upon employer’s latest filing.

This would not apply if the new work location is within the same metropolitan statistical area (MSA) or an “area of intended employment” covered by the existing approved H-1B petition. If the H-1B employee is moving to a new job location within the same MSA or area of intended employment a new LCA is not required. Therefore, the employer does not need to file an amended H-1B petition. However, the employer must still post the original LCA in the new work location within the same MSA or area of intended employment.

Short term placement : Under certain circumstances, an employer may place an H-1B employee at a new job location for up to 30 days, and in some cases 60 days (where the employee is still based at the original location), without obtaining a new LCA.

Non-worksite locations: Also, if H-1B employee is only going to a non-worksite location, the employer does not need to file an amended H-1B petition. A location is considered to be “non-worksite” if the H-1B employees are going to a location to participate in employee developmental activity, such as management conferences and staff seminars, where the H-1B employees spend little time at any one location; or the job is “peripatetic in nature,” such as situations where their primary job is at one location but they occasionally travel for short periods to other locations “on a casual, short-term basis, which can be recurring but not excessive (i.e., not exceeding five consecutive workdays for any one visit by a peripatetic worker, or 10 consecutive workdays for any one visit by a worker who spends most work time at one location and travels occasionally to other locations).”


Here is the link to USCIS announcement :

THE BIG NEWS – USCIS allows certain H4 dependent spouses to work from May 26, 2015

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that effective May 26, 2015, they will allow certain H-4 dependent spouses of H-1B nonimmigrants to obtain EAD – Employment authorization. This announcement comes as part of President’s recent Executive action on immigration reform.

Eligible H-4 dependent spouses will be those, whose spouses are H-1B nonimmigrants and are the principal beneficiaries of an approved Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker; or have been granted H-1B status under sections 106(a) and (b) of the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-first Century Act of 2000. The Act permits H-1B nonimmigrants seeking lawful permanent residence to work and remain in the United States beyond the six-year limit on their H-1B status.

Eligible H-4 dependent spouses must file Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, with supporting evidence and the required $380 fee in order to obtain employment authorization and receive a Form I-766, Employment Authorization Document (EAD).

USCIS will begin accepting applications on May 26, 2015. Once USCIS approves the Form I-765 and the H-4 dependent spouse receives an EAD, he or she may begin working in the United States.

 For USCIS announcement click below

About us:     SmoothImmigration.COM
SmoothImmigration, which is part of Bhatia & Co, specializes in addressing the many complexities in Immigration process, to help businesses and individual navigate through the various stages of processes. Bhatia & Co is a diversified Full service Immigration, financial and business services firm concentrating on providing services to domestic and international organizations.
Our Team of highly skilled and diversified range of professionals provide service in all areas of Immigration,

We also render full range of services in areas of tax planning and tax preparation, audit and assurance, compliance, corporate service, accounting, outsourcing, business consulting, financial and retirement planning and litigation support service to a diverse range of businesses and individuals. 
Our US entity, Bhatia & Co, Inc incorporated in California in 2000 is headquatered in the heart of Silicon Valley, and has professional offices located in several locations in US, India with an associate office in Canada.

We are immigration consultants bonded with the California secretary of state


Santa Clara, California:
(Business & Immigration Consultants)

5201 Great America Parkway, Suite 256, , Santa Clara, CA 95054
(408) 845 9411 (Phone)
(408) 351 0700 (Fax) (Website)

Pleasanton, California : (New office)

5776, Stoneridge Mall Road, Ste 285
Pleasanton, CA-94588

925-260-1245 (Phone)